- Look for web sites written by a person, institution, or organization which you already trust.
- Government Agencies, academic or medical institution and scientific journals or books are generally good places to start.
- If possible, get information from more than one source so that you get several different points of view to help you make the decisions that affect your medical care.
- Look for a clearly stated purpose, author or editorial board and source of funding on the web site. Who wrote the site, what are they trying to do, and how is this being paid for?
- For example, the makers of Tylenol™ have much to gain by promoting its product over Advil™. The information may be correct, but you may have to visit other sites to get the entire picture.
- If there is advertising on the site, it should be clearly set apart from the information.
- To ensure you are looking at current information, look for dates on a web site that shows when the site was first placed on the Internet, and when the page was last reviewed or revised.
- Medical facts and figures should have references, and sources of facts should be clearly listed.
- Opinions and advice should be clearly set apart from information that is “evidence-based” (that is, based on research).
- Look for a privacy statement. If a site asks you to register, do they tell you what they will and won’t do with that information?
|
Web Sites
For more information on evaluating web sites, visit the following web pages:
Center for Health Information Quality
Discern
Michigan E-Library
The following web sites are good places to start when looking for medical information:
MEDLINEplus
American Academy of Family Physicians
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Medical Association
CancerNet
Clinical Trials
Health Web
MEL Health Information Resources
NOAH
|
|
WARNING:
Anyone can put anything on the Internet. There are no rules stating what kind of health information can be put on the Internet or who puts it there. If is sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
|
|
Patient / Family / Community Education Committee
Criteria to Evaluate web site
|
What is the purpose of the site?
Is there an “About this Site” link?
Is the individual or group promoting
a particular point of view?
Who is the intended audience?
|
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
|
___ No
___ No
___ No
|
|
What type of site is it?
|
___ Advocacy
___Business/Marketing
___News
|
___Informational/
Educational
___ Personal
|
|
Authority
Is it clear who wrote the content for
the site?
What are the author’s
qualifications?
Can they be verified?
Is contact information provided?
|
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
|
___ No
___ No
___ No
___ No |
|
Responsibility
Is the source of funding for the web
site clearly stated or readily
apparent?
Is the site managed and reviewed
by an editorial board?
If there is advertising, is it clear
what is advertising and what is
content?
|
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
|
___ No
___ No
___ No
|
|
Accuracy of the information
Do the medical facts and figures
have references?
Are sources clearly listed on the
site?
Are opinions and advice clearly set
apart?
|
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
|
___ No
___ No
___ No
|
|
Is the information up to date?
Are there dates on the site to
indicate:
When the page was written?
When the page was last
reviewed / revised?
A copyright date?
Are there broken links?
|
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
|
___ No
___ No
___ No
___ No
|
|
Breadth and depth of coverage
Is the information in depth?
|
___ Yes
|
___ No
|
|
Privacy Statement
Does the site ask you for any
personal information or require
you to register?
If so, does the site indicate what
they will and will not do with
the information?
Do they have a privacy statement
|
___ Yes
___ Yes
___ Yes
|
___ No
___ No
___ No
|
All links have been selectively reviewed and approved by the librarian at the Helen L. DeRoy Medical Library. Neither the library nor Providence Hospital (PH) is responsible for broken links within sites outside of the PH web site, any information outside of the PH web site or maintenance of external sites.